The New Formula for Gravitational Acceleration

Yes, my research has led to the discovery of a new definition for gravitational acceleration. Gravitational acceleration, g, is determined solely by the transformations present in the local spacetime, and without reference to the gravitational field’s mass source.

dt/dr or tau, is the change in time dilation over the change in distance in that local region of spacetime.

This formula is the correct description of accleration, i.e. force, for all non-nuclear forces. At the present time I do not included nuclear forces as I have not tested this formula for nuclear forces.

This formula is thus the basis for gravity modification and force field technologies.

It should not take you more than 5 minutes to verify this formula if you have an Excel Add In like XNumbers.

Will post/talk more at a later date.

Just remembered that I have posted typo errors found in the book An Introduction to Gravity Modification and their corrections, here.


Benjamin T Solomon
PO Box 831
Evergreen, CO 80437, USA


About Benjamin Solomon
Ben Solomon is a Committee Member of the Nuclear and Future Flight Propulsion Technical Committee, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics (AIAA), and author of An Introduction to Gravity Modification and Super Physics for Super Technologies: Replacing Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger & Einstein (with Kindle Version)

3 Responses to The New Formula for Gravitational Acceleration

  1. Antonio Saraiva says:

    Your formula has wrong units!

  2. Thanks Antonio. Your coment is a common misinterpretation of the formula. The numerical value of the constant term is c^2 but its units is m^2/s^3.

    If you have an Add In like XNumbers you can test the formula yourself. For example for a particle the of the size 10^-11 m in zero-gravity, on the surface of the Earth, it near- and far-side edges would be the following distances from the center of the Earth:

    The time dilations at these two edges would be:

    Plugging these numbers into the formula would give, 9.797989224 m/s^2 which is within the experimental error of 9.802893102m/s^2 using the Newtonian formula.


  3. josh says:

    This formula is quite remarkable! It very much reminds me of Edward Purcell’s explanation of magnetic fields; that they are just relativistic electrostatics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: