Super Physics for Super Technologies

CoverThumbnailTitle: Super Physics for Super Technologies
Sub Title: Replacing Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger & Einstein
Author: Benjamin T Solomon
Paperback: 154 pages
Publisher: Propulsion Physics, Inc. (March 19, 2015)
ISBN-10: 1508948011
ISBN-13: 978-1508948018
Language: English

Publisher’s Link: Super Physics for Super Technologies
Amazon’s Link: Super Physics for Super Teconologies

Reviewer’s comments: “Benjamin is the second researcher I have met who has tried to consider a nonsingular cosmology. The first was Christi Stoica, which I met in 2010”.
Andrew Beckwith PhD

The Objective: This book, Super Physics for Super Technologies, proposes that a new physics exists. The findings are based on 16 years of extensive numerical modeling with empirical data, and therefore, both testable and irrefutable.

The Need: In 2012 Prof. Nemiroff, using Hubble photographs, showed that quantum foam cannot exists. In 2013, Solomon showed that both exotic matter and strings could not exists. In 2015 the Kavli Foundation, with Prof. Efstathiou, Prof. Pryke, Prof. Steinhard discussed the issues with the Planck Space Telescope findings of a Universe that is significantly simpler than our theories. Therefore the need for new physics.

The Benefits: The replacement of the Schrödinger wave function with a simpler probabilistic wave function, results in a new electron shell model based on the Rydberg equation, giving exact results with quantum mechanics; leading to a new Standard Model and the unification of photon shielding, transmission and invisibility as the same phenomenon. Solomon’s inference is that any current or future stealth technology can be neutralized.

The Possibilities: Is it possible to rewrite physics and the old great cherished masters? This work is based on extensive numerical modeling of known empirical data and theorizing. Therefore, the answer must be YES.

Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Lockheed for nominating me to the position of Committee Member, Nuclear and Future Flight Propulsion Technical Committee, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics (AIAA)

Advertisements

Crisis In Physics

Per the Scientific American article “Super Symmetry and the Crisis in Physics”, the crisis in super symmetry physics is causing physicist to search for a new physics. Could this new physics be non-particle based? A physics closer to General Relativity than to either Quantum or String theories?

The Experiments that Started this Investigation into Gravity Modification

From New Physics to New Weapons Technologies

My paper “New Evidence, Conditions, Instruments & Experiments for Gravitational Theories” was finally published by the Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 8A, 2013. That is today Aug 26, 2013.

Over the last several years I had been compiling a list of inconsistencies in modern contemporary physics. This paper documents 12 inconsistencies. If I’m correct there will sooner or later, be a massive rewrite of modern physical theories, because I do not just criticize contemporary theories but critique them, i.e. provide positive suggestions based on empirical data, on how our theories need to be modified.

The upshot of all this is that I was able to propose two original, new experiments, never before contemplated in physics journals. Both involve new experimental devices, and one is so radically new that it is unthinkable. This is the gravity wave *telescope*.

The new physics lends itself to a new and different forms of weaponizations achievable within the next few decades, with technologies *not* predicted in science fiction. How about that?

I have deliberately left this weaponization part vague because I want to focus on the propulsion technologies. Definitely not something string or quantum-gravity theories can even broach.

We will achieve interstellar travel in my lifetime, and my paper points to where to research this new physics and new technologies.

Paper Details:

Title:   New Evidence, Conditions, Instruments & Experiments for Gravitational Theories

Author:    Benjamin T Solomon

Journal:    Journal of Modern Physics, 2013, Vol 8A

Journal Link (2013, Vol 8A):   http://www.scirp.org/journal/JMP/

Paper Links:        http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?paperID=36276

Notes:   Down load count is displayed at the paper link on the journal web page, so you can see how many people are interested in this topic.

——————————————

Benjamin T Solomon is the author of the 12-year study An Introduction to Gravity Modification

Mechanics of Gravity Modification

The Rocky Mountain chapter of the American Institute of Astronautics & Aeronautics (AIAA) will be having their 2nd Annual Technical Symposium, October 25 2013. The call for papers ends May 31 2013. I would recommend submitting your papers. This conference gives you the opportunity to put your work together in a cohesive manner, get feedback and keep your copyrights, before you write your final papers for journals you will submitting to. A great way to polish your papers.

Here is the link to the call for papers: http://www.iseti.us/pdf/RMAIAA_Call_For_Abstracts_2013-0507.pdf

Here is the link to the conference: http://www.iseti.us/pdf/RMAIAA_General_Advert_2013-0507.pdf

I’ll be presenting 2 papers. The first is a slightly revised version of the presentation I gave at the APS April 2013 conference here in Denver (http://www.iseti.us/WhitePapers/APS2013/Solomon-APS-April(2013-04-15).pdf). The second is titled ‘The Mechanics of Gravity Modification’.

Fabrizio Brocca from Italy wanted to know more about the Ni field shape for a rotating-spinning-disc. Finally, a question from someone who has read my book. This is not easy to explain over email, so I’m presenting the answers to his questions at this conference, as ‘The Mechanics of Gravity Modification’. That way I can reach many more people. Hope you can attend, read the book, and have your questions ready.  I’m looking forward to your questions. This is going to be a lively discussion, and we can adjourn off conference.

My intention for using this forum to explain some of my research is straight forward. There will be (if I am correct) more than 100 aerospace companies in attendance, and I am expecting many of them will return to set up engineering programs to reproduce, test and explore gravity modification as a working technology.

Fabrizio Brocca I hope you can make it to Colorado this October, too.

——————————————

Benjamin T Solomon is the author of the 12-year study An Introduction to Gravity Modification

Need for a New Theory on Gravity

I had a great time at APS 2013 held April 13 – 16, 2013. I presented my paper “Empirical Evidence Suggest A Different Gravitational Theory” in track T10, Tuesday afternoon. A copy of the slides is available at this link.

http://www.iseti.us/WhitePapers/APS2013/Solomon-APS-April(2013-04-15).pdf

Have fun.

——————————————

Benjamin T Solomon is the author of the 12-year study An Introduction to Gravity Modification

Robert Nemiroff Disproved Travel at 1,000+ Velocity of Light Using Quantum Foam

Recently, Robert Nemiroff, an astrophysicist at Michigan Technological University, showed that some if not all of the theoretical work behind quantum foam and quantum gravity may be invalidated. That is an immense finding!

I had grown up thinking that quantum foam was real. Now I find that it is a hypothesis only and yet to be proven to be a fact. Imagine that! How much of physics, are we are taught as real but is actually unproven mathematical hypotheses?

How did he do this? He detected 3 photons that had travelled 7 billion light years from a gamma-ray burst to arrive on Earth only very recently, about a millisecond apart in total or approximately 300 km apart at most.

What is the probability of this 3-photon journey happening? Almost zero, therefore this interest in his findings.

Could the 3 photons have been aligned near Earth due to some spacetime warp? No, natural gravitational fields are symmetrical. Therefore, any ‘disturbance’ introduced to a photon on the way into a gravitational field would be reversed on their way out of the gravitational field. They had to be aligned at journey beginning, 7 billion light years ago, otherwise they would have gone their different directions and Robert Nemiroff would not have recorded them together.

Could a lensing or focusing effect cause this? The experimental physicist Robert Nemiroff did not think so, neither did Giovanni Amelino-Camelia who proposed the experiment to prove quantum foam. But Amelino-Camelia had said the equivalent of ‘not so fast buddy’, because we need to repeat this observation to confirm conclusively that quantum foam and quantum gravity has been invalidated. I bet that has started a search for similar 3 photon arrivals in the recorded archives of our sky.

Is this finding real? Yes, his findings were published in Physical Review Letters, probably the most prestigious physics journal in the world, today.

What is the significance of 3 photons only 300km apart travelling 7 billion light years together? That nothing but quantum foam could have dispersed them, but there were not dispersed, and therefore, quantum foam does not exists.

It will set quantum mechanics back several decades. 30? 50? 70? If Robert Nemiroff findings point to severe fundamental problems than it could be closer to 70 years, if not may be 30 years.

Actually, the fact that quantum foam may not exists is a major fundamental breakthrough. The more I think about it the more I have to say ‘wow’. Some physicists have proposed that they can achieve 1,000+ the velocity of light with theoretical work based on quantum foam. Wow! It is gone! Robert Nemiroff just disproved them.

There are two reasons why I say the problems maybe more fundamental than physicists suspect. First, I showed that the photon probability is not Gaussian. It is a new probability distribution I discovered and named Var-Gamma. FYI there are only 32 known probability distributions. The last on was discovered in the 1970s by a Scandinavian team. Therefore, this is a big deal. And, especially because this Var-Gamma probability distribution enables the unification of resolution, transmission, shielding, invisibility into a single phenomenon, which quantum mechanics has not accomplished.

Second, this wave function is not consistent with Special Theory of Relativity because length must be zero. Therefore, the photon wave function is not the photon. Not even a description of the photon. This wave function is caused by the photon disturbing spacetime. So we detect the photon’s presence by detecting it signature wave function disturbance. Just as we observe a contrail and know that a fighter jet is present, yet we don’t mistake the contrail for the fighter jet. This signature disturbance is unique to the type of particle, and therefore, we easily mistake this signature wave function disturbance for the actual ‘particle’.

I developed a photon description that is consistent with Special Theory of Relativity, that anything travelling at the velocity of light must have zero thickness.

Because it is consistent, subspace must exist, and therefore, interstellar travel.

—————————————————————————————————

Benjamin T Solomon is the author & principal investigator of the 12-year study into the theoretical & technological feasibility of gravitation modification, titled An Introduction to Gravity Modification, to achieve interstellar travel in our lifetimes. For more information visit iSETI LLC, Interstellar Space Exploration Technology Initiative.

Solomon is inviting all serious participants to his LinkedIn Group Interstellar Travel & Gravity Modification.